Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/30627/2023 of SHUBHAM SONI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024WRIT PETITION No. 30627 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
SHUBHAM SONI S/O LATE SHRI MANGLESH SONI,AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION SERVICE R/OWARD NO. 10 SHAHID PARTEL COLONY TAWA COLONYSEONIMALWA DISTRICT NARMADPURAM (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI ASHISH KUMAR PANDEY)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBANADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMNENT MINISTRY VALLABH BHAWAN,BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBANADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMNENT MINISTRY VALLABH BHAWAN,BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.COMMISSIONER URBAN ADMINISTRATION ANDDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.JOINT DIRECTOR URBAN ADMINISTRATION ANDDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INDORE DIVISIONINDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INDORE DIVISIONINDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.CHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICER MUNICIPALCOUNCIL SEONIMALWA DISTRICTNARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)COUNCIL SEONIMALWA DISTRICTNARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI MANAS MANI VERMA - GOVT. ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed thefollowing:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for correction of details ofrespondent No.3.
He is permitted to do so.
This Petition is filed seeking a direction to designate the petitioner on thepost of Assistant Grade-III in place of Assistant Grade-IV (Pump Collie) anddecide the petitioner's representation in the hands of respondent No.4.
2. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to petitioner tofile a fresh representation within 15 days from the date of receipt of certifiedcopy of this order being passed today before respondent No.4, thenrespondent No.4 shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation withina further period of 60 days by passing a speaking order, in accordance withlaw, under the communication to the petitioner.
3. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
4. In above terms, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
ts
(VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE