Sikkim High Court
WP(PIL)/4/2021 of Anita Sherpa Vs State of Sikkim and Ors. on 1 June 2021
SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing WP (PIL) No. 04/2021 ANITA SHERPA PETITIONER (S) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. RESPONDENT (S) For Petitioner : Mr. Yam Kumar Subba, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General Mr. Hissey Gyaltsen, Asst. Govt.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WP (PIL) No. 04/2021
ANITA SHERPA
STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.
VERSUS
PETITIONER (S)
RESPONDENT (S)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Yam Kumar Subba, Advocate
For Respondents : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General Mr. Hissey Gyaltsen, Asst. Govt. Advocate Date: 01/06/2021
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, J.
…
PER J.K. MAHESHWARI, CJ
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file Election Petitions as permissible under law.
On passing the order by the Election Tribunal/District Judge concerned, on the ground of provisions of the amended Ordinance and the Act or the Rules, as the case may be, the individual petitioners are having liberty to take recourse of law challenging the vires of the provisions of the Act, as assailed in this Writ Petition.
With the aforesaid liberty, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Judge
Chief Justice