Sikkim High Court
FAO/1/2018 of M/s. Himalaya Distilleries Ltd. Vs Urmila Pradhan and Ors on 19 February 2018
COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) DATED : 19th FEBRUARY, 2018 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, CHIEF JUSTICE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)
DATED : 19[th ]FEBRUARY, 2018
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, CHIEF JUSTICE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance Mr. Passang Tshering Bhutia, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. T.B. Thapa, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tangchen Doma Gyatso and Mr. Ranjan Chettri, Advocates for Respondent No. 4.
Mr.Tashi Rapten Barfungpa, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 & 6.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OR D ER(ORAL)
Satish K. Agnihotri, C.J.
IA No. 01/2018
This is an application, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the appellant has approached the trial Court for interim relief, which stands accepted in terms of the order passed by the learned District Judge, East Sikkim at Gangtok and thus, nothing survives at this stage. Thus, the appellant be permitted to withdraw the appeal and to pursue the remedy before the trial Court.
Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection.
The application is ordered. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satish K. Agnihotri)
Chief Justice
19-02-2018
Approved for reporting : Yes Internet : Yes