Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/57/2022 of RAJENDRA PRASAD MANGLA AND ANR. Vs ANJU AGRAWAL AND ORS. on 13 December 2022
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (C) No. 57 of 2022 RAJENDRA PRASAD MANGLA & ANR. .... PETITIONERS VERSUS ANJU AGRAWAL & 0RS. .... RESPONDENTS Date: 13.12.2022 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioners : Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate. Ms. Bhawana
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (C) No. 57 of 2022
RAJENDRA PRASAD MANGLA & ANR.
.... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
ANJU AGRAWAL & 0RS.
.... RESPONDENTS
Date: 13.12.2022
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioners : Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate. Ms. Bhawana Rai, Advocate.
For Respondents :
None.
..........
The writ petition seeks to assail the Order dated 27.08.2022 passed by the learned District Judge determining an amount of Rs.5,50,000/- as assessed by the Engineers in the Technical Report as per the direction of the Supreme Court dated 02.09.2021. By the Order dated 02.09.2021 in Miscellaneous Application No.1185/2021 in Contempt Petition (C) No 279/2021 in SLP (C) No.20914/2019 the Supreme Court ordered that the determination by the District Judge will be final on this account and that amount will be paid by the judgment debtor to the decree holder. The Supreme Court also ordered that issue will foreclose with that determination and no further proceeding will be initiated regarding that aspect. Inspite of the Order dated 02.09.2021 the petitioners are before this Court assailing the Order dated 27.08.2022 by way of the present writ petition. In view of the clear Order of the Supreme Court this writ petition is not maintainable and is therefore, dismissed.
Judge