Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/39/2023 of Arun Kumar Gupta Vs State of Sikkim and Ors. on 5 April 2024
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (C) No. 39 of 2023 ARUN KUMAR GUPTA .... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. .... RESPONDENTS Date:05.04.2024 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr. A . Moulik, Senior Advocate. Mr. Ranjit Prasad,
ARUN KUMAR GUPTA
.... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.
.... RESPONDENTS
Date:05.04.2024
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioner
: Mr. A. Moulik, Senior Advocate. Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Advocate.
For Respondent : Nos. 1 to 6.
Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, Government Advocate. Mr. Zigmee Bhutia, Law Officer, Education Department.
…………
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner places on record Order bearing reference No.20/CS/SKM/2024 dated 27.03.2024 (marked ‘Y’) passed by the Appellate Authority in appeal in a disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner. The learned Senior Counsel submits that in view of the Order passed by the Appellate Authority he is fully satisfied and does not desire to pursue this writ petition further.
2. The learned Senior Counsel also makes a fervent plea that the Government may be directed to make payment of his retirement benefits at the earliest as he has been suspended from the year 2017. This Court is confident that when an Order granting retirement benefits as indicated in the Order is passed by the Appellate Authority the Government would definitely consider disbursing the benefits at the earliest. The Writ Petition (C) No 39 of 2023 stands disposed as withdrawn.
Judge