Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/36/2025 of Titan Company Limited Vs The Union of India and Ors. on 30 July 2025
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No.36 of 2025 TITAN COMPANY LIMITED PETITIONER VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 30.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner For Respondents R-1, 3 to 5 R-2 Mr. Ramamurthy S.,
Record of Proceedings
WP(C) No.36 of 2025
TITAN COMPANY LIMITED
PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
Date: 30.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Petitioner Mr. Ramamurthy S., Advocate (through VC).
Mr. Sahil Gurung, Advocate.
For Respondents R-1, 3 to 5
Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Deputy Solicitor General of India.
R-2 Ms. Pema Bhutia, Assistant Government Advocate.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The Petitioner has filed I.A. No.03 of 2025 seeking to place Order dated 22-07-2025, by which the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax, Gangtok Division, has dropped the Demand Notice dated 20-06-2025.
I.A. No.04 of 2025 filed by Respondent No.5 is the same document.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Deputy Solicitor General submit that the matter is now rendered infructuous in view of the said Order of the Assistant Commissioner, dated 22-07-2025, which reads as follows; “ORDERI order to drop the Demand Note issued under No.17/Demand Note/Budgetary Support/Titan/Gtk-Div/2025-26 Date:20/06/2025 to M/s TITAN COMPANY LIMITED [GSTIN – 11AAACT5131A2Z9] & Unique ID: UNQSBS11AAACT5131A2Z90001, in terms of the DPIIT clarification letter issued under No. P-66023/3/2025-GSTSS dated 10/07/2025 and the CBIC clarification issued under Letter No. CBIC-110267/107/2023-CX. VIII SECTION-CBEC dated 18/07/2025.
……………………………………………………………………….”
In view of the said circumstances and on consideration of the Order and the joint submissions of Learned opposing Counsel in this context, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Judge30.07.2025