Sikkim High Court

WP(C)/41/2011 of Santosh Kumar Bardewa Vs The State of Sikkim and Another on 13 October 2011

.10.11 Index: Internet ftyNO Y3,lun caseNo..hl..e.S.t>..N.€.....4.!,l.2.?.!)................. Order (s) with Signature (s) BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. WANGDI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE resent: Mr. U.P. Sharma and Mr. G. Lama, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate

i`caseNo..hl..e.S.t>..N.€.....4.!,l.2.?.!).................Serial No.Order (s) with Signature (s)BEFOREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. WANGDI,ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE02.1 .10.11resent: Mr. U.P. Sharma and Mr. G. Lama, Advocates for thepetitioner.Mr, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. S. K.Chettri, Asstt. Govt. Advocate for the State-respondents.Mr. U.P. Sharma, learned Advocate, at the out setsubmits that since the State-respondents have issued noticeupon the petitioner under Section 9 of th.e Sikkim Allotment ofHouse Sites and Const:ruct:ion of Building (Regulation andControl) Act:, 1985, he has been instructed not to press thematter further.Heard and considered.This writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.Index:ftyNOInternetY3,lun

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead