Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/32/2020 of Rinki Vs State of Sikkim and Ors on 12 August 2024
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings Page | 1 WP(C) No.32 of 2020 RINKI PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 12.08.2024 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Advocate. Ms. Pema Dechen Bhutia, Advocate.
RINKI PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS
Date: 12.08.2024 CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Petitioner Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Advocate.
Ms. Pema Dechen Bhutia, Advocate.
Petitioner present in person.
For Respondents
R-1 to R-4 Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, Additional Advocate General.
Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, Government Advocate. Mr. Passang Tshering Bhutia, Retainer (R-3).
R-5 Ms. Rachhitta Rai, Advocate.
R-6 None present.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. None appears for the Respondent No.6, however, it is informed by Learned Counsel for all parties that they are aware that the father of the Learned Deputy Solicitor General is critically ill and hospitalized at Siliguri, West Bengal and the assisting Counsel is unable to appear before this Court due to landslide, resulting in road blocks.
2. It is submitted by Learned Counsel for the parties that this Court, while considering the report of the Committee, dated 03-12-2019, at Paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the Order dated 03-04-2024, directed as follows; “4. Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties and given due consideration to the submissions, the Committee report, dated 03-12-2019, is accordingly quashed and set aside.”
5. The State-Respondents, as undertaken by them, shall constitute a Committee in terms of the Rules of 2001 to look into the grievances of the Petitioner.
6. Let the Committee be constituted within one week from today and the report be submitted within four weeks’ thereafter.”
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIMRecord of Proceedings
3. In compliance to the Order supra, a new Committee was constituted. The new Committee has since furnished its report dated 19-07-2024. The report has been filed before this Court on 29-05-2024.
3.
4. It is jointly submitted by Learned Counsel for the parties that in view of the constitution of the fresh Committee and fresh report submitted thereto, the instant Writ Petition is infructuous and may be dismissed as such. That, the Petitioner seeks to assail the Committee report dated 19-07-2024 by taking appropriate steps.
5. On due consideration of the submissions and perusal of the report of the Committee dated 19-07-2024, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Judge12.08.2024
ds/sdl