Sikkim High Court
CRL.L.P/6/2014 of Chandra Kumar Sharma Vs Namtey Lepcha on 26 August 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Crl. L.P. No. 06/2014 Chandra Kumar Sharma vs. Namtey Lepcha BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN 01. 26.08.14 Present: M/s. Ajay Rathi, Rahul Rathi and Pema Wongmu Bhutia, Advocates for the Petitioner. … Learned counsel for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Crl. L.P. No. 06/2014
Chandra Kumar Sharma vs. Namtey Lepcha
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
01. 26.08.14 Present: M/s. Ajay Rathi, Rahul Rathi and Pema Wongmu Bhutia, Advocates for the Petitioner.
…
Learned counsel for petitioner/complainant submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this Crl. Leave to Appeal with liberty to file Appeal before District & Sessions Judge, in view of “proviso” inserted in Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by Act No. 5 of 2009 with effect from 31.12.2009.
The prayer appears to be reasonable, therefore, it is allowed.
Consequently the Crl. Leave to Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for.
pm/jk
Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes / No
Chief Justice 26.08.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Crl. A. No. 19/2014 Chandra Kumar Sharma vs. Namtey Lepcha BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
01. 26.08.14 Present: M/s. Ajay Rathi, Rahul Rathi and Pema Wongmu Bhutia, Advocates for the Appellant.
…
Learned counsel for appellant/complainant submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to file an Appeal before the District & Sessions Judge, in view of “proviso” inserted in Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by Act No. 5 of 2009 with effect from 31.12.2009.
The prayer appears to be reasonable, therefore, it is allowed.
Consequently the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for.
The certified copy of the impugned judgment and other documents, annexed with the Memo of Appeal, be returned to learned counsel for the appellant on furnishing photostat copy thereof.
pm/jk
Chief Justice
26.08.2014