Sikkim High Court
BAIL APPLN./10/2020 of Gaurav Kumar Vs State of Sikkim on 28 November 2020
NO. 10 of 2020 GAURAV KUMAR …PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM …RESPONDENT Date: 28.11.2020 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE … Mr. Rahul Rathi, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BAIL APPLN NO. 10 of 2020
GAURAV KUMAR
STATE OF SIKKIM
VERSUS
…PETITIONER
…RESPONDENT
Date: 28.11.2020
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE …
Mr. Rahul Rathi, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition inasmuch as the charge-sheet having not been filed by the Investigating Officer within a period of 90 days from the date of arrest of the petitioner, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim at Gangtok had granted bail to the petitioner.
Mr. Yadev Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no objection.
Accordingly, Bail Application No. 10 of 2020 is disposed of as not pressed.
jk/
ARUP Digitally signed by ARUP KUMAR KUMAR GOSWAMI Date: 2020.11.28 GOSWAMI12:45:21 +05'30'
Chief Justice