Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/25/2023 of MISS SITA KAMI (LOHAR) AND ORS. Vs STATE OF SIKKIM AND ANR. on 26 July 2023
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (C) No. 25 of 2023 MISS SITA KAMI (LOHAR) & ORS. ……. PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ANR. ……. RESPONDENTS Date: 26.07.2023 CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioners : Mr. A .
W.P. (C) No. 25 of 2023
MISS SITA KAMI (LOHAR) & ORS. ……. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
……. RESPONDENTS
STATE OF SIKKIM & ANR.
Date: 26.07.2023
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioners : Mr. A. Moulik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Advocate. Ms. Renuka Lohar, Advocate. Mr. Abinash Chettri, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. S. K. Chettri, Government Advocate. Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, Assistant Government Advocate.
………….
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. A. Moulik, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners. The Order dated 04.08.2022 passed by the learned Additional District Magistrate, Namchi with reference to a complaint against the Certificate Of Identification (COI) is under challenge.
2. Mr. A. Moulik, learned Senior Counsel submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the observations made therein. A perusal of the order reflects that the authority has not come to the conclusion in regard to the complaint as yet. It may not be proper to interfere at this stage. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. The authority shall proceed to decide the case as per law giving opportunity to the petitioners to place their case and evidence and satisfy the authority that the COI has not been obtained by misrepresentation or suppression of any material fact.
Judge