Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/20/2020 of Chung Chung Lepcha Vs The State of Sikkim and Anr on 6 October 2020
OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing W.P. (C) No.20 of 2020 CHUNG CHUNG LEPCHA …PETITIONER VERSUS THE STATE OF SIKKIM AND ANR. …RESPONDENTS Date: 06.10.2020 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE … On the last occasion,when
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
W.P. (C) No.20 of 2020
CHUNG CHUNG LEPCHA
…PETITIONER
THE STATE OF SIKKIM AND ANR.
VERSUS
…RESPONDENTS
Date: 06.10.2020
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
…
On the last occasion,when the matter was listed on 01.10.2020, the Court had passed the following order:- “An I.A being No.02/2020 was filed seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Mr. Y. K. Subba, learned Counsel, who is representing the petitioner, however, submits that the application was not filed by him.
Also heard Mr. Vivek Kohli, learned Advocate General, Sikkim appearing for the respondents.
In view of the submission of Mr. Subba, I direct Registry to list the case on 06.10.2020 so that, in the meantime, he may try to obtain instructions from the petitioner. Interim order shall continue till next date.”
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMIDigitally signed by ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI Date: 2020.10.06 13:56:13 +05'30'
Mr.Y.K.Subba, learned Counsel submits that the petitioner has informed him that he himself had filed I.A No.02/2020. He reiterates that the application was filed without his knowledge and the petitioner had not withdrawn the Vakalatnama.
Also heard Mr. Vivek kohli, learned Advocate General, Sikkim.
pm/
In IA No.02/2020, it is stated that petitioner does not want to proceed with the case because of usefulness of the welfare scheme being implemented by the state and involvement of Panchayats.
Since it is not in dispute that the petitioner himself had filed the application seeking leave of the court to withdraw the writ petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed on withdrawal.
IA No.02/2020 stands disposed of in terms of the above.
Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Accordingly, IA No.01/2020 stands disposed of.
ARUP Digitally signed by ARUP KUMAR KUMAR GOSWAMI Date: 2020.10.06 GOSWAMI13:56:33 +05'30'Chief Justice