Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/6/2017 of Ms Organic Sikkim Vs G.m.simfed and Anr. on 21 March 2017
No. 06/2017 M/s Organic Sikkim vs. G.M. SIMFED & Anr. BEFORE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, CJ. 02. 21.03.17 Present: Mr. Jorgay Namka and Ms. Panila Theengh, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Umesh Ranpal, Ms. Kimti Gurung, Ms. Sanju Gupta and Ms. Sashi Rai, Advocates for Respondent No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
W.P. (C) No. 06/2017 M/s Organic Sikkim vs. G.M. SIMFED & Anr.
BEFORE
MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, CJ.
02. 21.03.17 Present: Mr. Jorgay Namka and Ms. Panila Theengh, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. Umesh Ranpal, Ms. Kimti Gurung, Ms. Sanju Gupta and Ms. Sashi Rai, Advocates for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with Ms. Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
…
The petitioner, a registered firm, filed the instant petition, questioning the alleged irregularities in Notice Inviting Tender (N.I.T.) vide Ref. No. SIMFED/15-17/GM-IV/003 dated 21.01.2017.
On issuance of notice, it appears that the petitioner participated in the tender process and has been allotted the work. Resultantly, the petitioner files an application being I.A. No.2 of 2017, seeking permission to withdraw the case to which learned Counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. Accordingly, the application is ordered.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Chief Justice
21.03.2017
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No