Sikkim High Court
WP (Crl.)/3/2022 of IMRAN RASUL Vs MR. HEMANT RAI AND ANR. on 9 March 2023
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (CRL.) No. 03 of 2022 IMRAN RASUL .... PETITIONER VERSUS MR. HEMANT RAI & ANR. .... RESPONDENTS Date: 09.03.2023 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Thinlay
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
W.P. (CRL.) No. 03 of 2022
IMRAN RASUL
.... PETITIONER
VERSUS
MR. HEMANT RAI & ANR.
.... RESPONDENTS
Date: 09.03.2023
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia and Mr. Yadev Sharma, No.1. Additional Public Prosecutors.
For Respondent : Nos. 2
Ms. Laxmi Chakraborty, Advocate.
..........
Mr. Ranjit Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 has been amicably resolved and he does not desire to pursue this writ petition any further. Ms. Laxmi Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 confirms the same.
Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.1 submits that in fact the dispute is between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 and that the respondent no.1 is not a part of the compromise.
Keeping the above facts in mind, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. It is so ordered. All pending interlocutory application also stands disposed.
Judge