Sikkim High Court

WP(C)/30/2020 of Anil Rai and Ors. Vs The State of Sikkim and Anr. on 24 February 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No.30 of 2020 ANIL RAI AND OTHERS PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF SIKKIM AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS Date: 24.02.2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioners For Respondents Mr. Yam Kumar Subba, Advocate. Mr. Yadev

ANIL RAI AND OTHERS PETITIONERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF SIKKIM AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS Date: 24.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioners Mr. Yam Kumar Subba, Advocate.

For Respondents

Mr. Yadev Sharma, Government Advocate.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

In compliance to the Order of this Court dated 17-02-2023, the State-Respondents have filed a Compliance Report dated 20-02-2023.

Learned Government Advocate submits that out of the 57 aggrieved Petitioners from Gnathang Machong Constituency, on physical verification by the concerned officials, 44 (forty four) of them have been found to be eligible for the relief claimed under the Housing Scheme, being Sikkim Garib Aawas Yojana (SGAY). 13 applicants were found to be ineligible as they failed to fulfill the criteria laid down under the Scheme. From the 13 persons, one has since passed away, hence there are now 12 ineligible Petitioners.

Considered submissions.

On perusing the Order of this Court dated 17-11-2022, it was inter alia submitted by Learned Advocate General that the applicants be directed to submit individual applications putting forth their grievances with full particulars to enable the Committee to examine the grievances in light of the terms of reference of the Notification bearing O.O. No.17/RDD, dated 14-11-2022, issued by the Respondent No.2, Rural Development Department, Government of Sikkim. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners had undertaken to take steps.

No steps have been taken by the Petitioners in terms of the above Order and Learned Counsel for the Petitioners admits this position.

In the circumstances, the State-Respondents shall take necessary steps in terms of the Scheme, viz; Sikkim Garib Aawas Yojana for the 44 Petitioners found eligible by the concerned officials.

Nothing further remains for adjudication in the instant matter.

WP(C) No.30 of 2020 stands disposed of accordingly.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead