Sikkim High Court
Crl. A./11/2022 of STATE OF SIKKIM Vs PINTSO BHUTIA on 23 May 2023
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings Page 1 of 2 Crl.A. No.11 of 2022 STATE OF SIKKIM APPELLANT VERSUS PINTSO BHUTIA RESPONDENT Date: 23.05.2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Appellant For Respondent Mr. Yadev Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr.
STATE OF SIKKIM
VERSUS
APPELLANT
PINTSO BHUTIA
RESPONDENT
Date: 23.05.2023
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Appellant Mr. Yadev Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Assistant Public Prosecutor.
For Respondent Mr. Udai P. Sharma, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel).
Respondent in person.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Judgment pronounced in open Court.
Detailed Judgment vide separate sheets of paper.
Appeal allowed.
Let the Respondent surrender before this Court by 02.00 p.m. today, for hearing on Sentence.
02.00 p.m.ORDER ON SENTENCE
Heard Learned Counsel for the parties on Sentence.
It is submitted by Learned Additional Public Prosecutor that considering that the offence was committed by the Respondent an adult, on a child who was below twelve years of age, maximum imprisonment prescribed under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter, the “POCSO” Act) be imposed on him. That, so far as fine is concerned, he leaves it to the discretion of this Court.
Learned Legal Aid Counsel for the Respondent submits that considering that the Respondent has attended the Court all through the trial and also before this Court, that he has not at any stage hindered the trial or tampered with the witnesses, in addition to which he has no criminal antecedents, the minimum Sentence of imprisonment prescribed under the provision be imposed on the Respondent. That, minimum fine may also be imposed in consideration of the conduct of the Respondent.
Having considered the submissions of the Learned Counsel for the parties, it is relevant to note that Section 10 of the POCSO Act provides that when an aggravated sexual assault is committed, the imprisonment to be imposed shall not be less than 5 (five) years but which may extend to 7 (seven) years and he shall also be liable to fine.
In consideration of the submissions put forth before this Court by Learned Counsel for the parties and to meet the ends of justice, the Respondent is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 5 (five) years and to pay a fine of ₹ 500/- (Rupees five hundred) only, under Section 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012, in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment of one month.
The period of imprisonment already undergone by the Respondent during the investigation and trial, be set off against the period of imprisonment imposed on him today.
Criminal Appeal disposed of accordingly.
Let the Respondent/Convict be taken into custody immediately.
Registry to take necessary steps in this regard.
Copy of this Judgment and Order on Sentence be made over to the Convict and also be forwarded to the Learned Trial Court along with its records.
Judge23.05.2023
sdl