Sikkim High Court

WP(C)/27/2023 of MENUKA SHARMA AND ORS. Vs STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. on 23 November 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (C) No. 27 of 2023 MENUKA SHARMA & ORS. .... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. .... RESPONDENTS Date: 23.11.2023 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioners : Mr. N. Rai, Senior Legal Aid Counsel assisted by

W.P. (C) No. 27 of 2023

MENUKA SHARMA & ORS.

.... PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.

.... RESPONDENTS

Date: 23.11.2023

CORAM

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.

For Petitioners : Mr. N. Rai, Senior Legal Aid Counsel assisted by Mr. Yozan Rai, Legal Aid Counsel and Ms. Tara Devi Chettri, Advocate.

For Respondent : Nos. 1, 2 & 4 to 6.

Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Government Advocate. Mr. Yadev Sharma, Government Advocate.

For Respondent : No.3.

Mr. Rahul Rathi, Advocate.

For Respondent : Ms. Subaksha Pradhan, Advocate. No.7.

..........

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition seeks a direction upon the respondents to stop construction of the new proposed road from Tarpin to Chalisey Dara, Rhenock from the ancestral land of the petitioners and direct the respondents to look for alternative route. An affidavit dated 22.11.2023 has been filed by respondent nos. 1

and 2 which states in paragraph 5 thereof that the respondent nos.

1 & 2 have decided that they would not excavate the land of the petitioners and instead look for an alternate route.

2.

2. In view of the categorical statements of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 nothing survives in the writ petition. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the same. In view of the undertaking by way of this above affidavit dated 22.11.2023 the W.P. (C) No.27 of 2023 is disposed of in the above terms. Pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of accordingly.

Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead