Sikkim High Court
WP(PIL)/40/2011 of Anand Lama Vs Union of India and Ors. on 13 August 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011 Anand Lama vs. Union of India & Ors. BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE 22. 13.08.14 Present: M/s. Pratap Khati, Navin Sharma and Pritima Sunam, (Jain, CJ)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION
W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011 Anand Lama vs. Union of India & Ors.
BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE
22. 13.08.14 Present:
(Jain, CJ)
M/s. Pratap Khati, Navin Sharma and Pritima Sunam, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anand Lama, Petitioner in person.
M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
…
Learned counsel for petitioner after arguing the case for some time, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw this petition.
Prayer is not opposed by learned Advocate General.
In view of the above, we allow this writ petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
BEFORE
(Jain, CJ)
M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
…
Since the main writ petition, W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011,
has been dismissed as withdrawn, therefore, no order is required to be passed on this Application and the same stands disposed off.
BEFORE
(Jain, CJ)
M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
…
Since the main writ petition, W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011,
has been dismissed as withdrawn, therefore, no order is required to be passed on this Application and the same stands disposed off.
BEFORE
(Jain, CJ)
M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
…
Since the main writ petition, W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011,
has been dismissed as withdrawn, therefore, no order is required to be passed on this Application and the same stands disposed off.
BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE
08. 13.08.14 Present:
(Jain, CJ)
M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
…
Since the main writ petition, W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011,
has been dismissed as withdrawn, therefore, no order is required to be passed on this Application and the same stands disposed off.
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE
10. 13.08.14 Present:
(Jain, CJ)
M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
…
Since the main writ petition, W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011,
has been dismissed as withdrawn, therefore, no order is required to be passed on this Application and the same stands disposed off.
Judge 13.08.2014
Chief Justice 13.08.2014