Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2109/2024 of BHAGWAN DAS SAKET Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2109 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
BHAGWAN DAS SAKET S/O SHRI BHAGEERTH SAKET,AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GRAM ROJGARSAHAYAK VILLAGE JEER POST VINDUL TEHSIL MADADISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI PARAG TIWARI - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHTHE SECRETARY PANCHAYAT AND RURALDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VALLABHBHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)THE SECRETARY PANCHAYAT AND RURALDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VALLABHBHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.COLLECTOR SINGRAULI DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.JILA PANCHAYAT SINGRAULI THROUGH ITSCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JILA PANCHAYATSINGRAULI DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JILA PANCHAYATSINGRAULI DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)
4.JANPAD PANCHAYAT BAIDHAN THROUGH ITSCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JANPAD PANCHAYATBAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JANPAD PANCHAYATBAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI G.P. SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed against a show cause notice dated 05.01.2024
whereby the petitioner was asked to give response prior to 09.01.2024.
2. A response has already been submitted by the petitioner on 11.01.2024,but despite of the same, no final decision has been taken by the authorities andon the contrary, salary of the petitioner has been stopped.
3. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that a final decision in thematter, if not already taken, will be taken shortly.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact thatthis petition has been filed only against a show cause notice, this court is notinclined to pass any order on the merit of the matter. The authorities may pass afinal order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a certifiedcopy of this order.
5. Needless to mention here that this court has not opined anything onmerits of the matter.
6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed off. No order as to costs.
sj
(VISHAL MISHRA)JUDGE