Sikkim High Court
BAIL APPLN./10/2021 of SAROJ PRADHAN Vs STATE OF SIKKIM on 21 May 2021
SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing BAIL APPLN. No. 10/2021 SAROJ PRADHAN APPLICANT (S) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM RESPONDENT (S) For Applicant : Mr. N. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sushant Subba, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Public Prosecutor Mr. Hissey Gyaltsen,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BAIL APPLN. No. 10/2021
Date: 21/05/2021
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. …
Heard Mr. N. Rai, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant along with Mr. Sushant Subba. Also heard Mr. Sudesh Joshi, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.
After arguing for some time, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant seeks withdrawal of this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after recording of statement of the victim and the mother of the victim in the Court.
During the course of hearing it is apprised to the Court that the applicant is pursuing Masters’ Degree, however, learned Public Prosecutor shall instruct the Jail Authorities to make available the mobile phone for the purpose of online study only. It is further observed that the applicant shall not use the mobile phone for talking to others except for educational purpose.
Chief Justice