Sikkim High Court
WP(PIL)/10/2020 of Karma Thupden Chopel Bhutia Vs The State of Sikkim and Ors. on 10 March 2021
SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing WP (PIL) No. 10/2020 KARMA THUPDEN CHOPEL BHUTIA PETITIONER (S) VERSUS THE STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. RESPONDENTS (S) For petitioner : Mr. S. S. Hamal, Advocate. For respondents no. : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. 1 to 3 Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WP (PIL) No. 10/2020
KARMA THUPDEN CHOPEL BHUTIA PETITIONER (S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.
RESPONDENTS (S)
For petitioner : Mr. S. S. Hamal, Advocate. For respondents no. : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. 1 to 3 Mr. Yadev Sharma, Govt. Advocate. Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Asst. Government Advocate.
Date: 10/03/2021
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, J.
…
PER J.K. MAHESHWARI, CJ
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondents.
After hearing learned Counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties, we are of the considered opinion that this petition under shape of Public Interest Litigation is not entertainable. At this stage, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to take recourse of law, as permissible.
Accordingly, this Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.
Judge
Chief Justice