Sikkim High Court

WP(PIL)/9/2016 of In Re Pipon And Gambos Of Lachen Dzomsa Vs x on 2 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings Page 1 of 2 WP (PIL) No. 09/2016 IN RE- PIPON AND GAMBOS OF LACHEN DZOMSA For Petitioner : Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Amicus Curiae. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate. Mr. Yadev Sharma, Govt.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

WP (PIL) No. 09/2016

IN RE- PIPON AND GAMBOS OF LACHEN DZOMSA

For Petitioner : Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Amicus Curiae. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate. Mr. Yadev Sharma, Govt. Advocate. For Respondents No. : Ms. Alishiba Rai, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Sangita 2, 3 and 4 Pradhan, Asst. Solicitor General of India.

Date: 02/12/2021

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

…

JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice)

This Public Interest Litigation was instituted sometime in the year 2016, on the basis of a letter which was addressed by one Pipon, Lachen Dzomsa, North Sikkim to the “Hon’ble Judge, Supreme Court of India, Camp at Lachen, North Sikkim”, seeking a direction upon the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, to make payment of compensation for occupation of their land, expeditiously. This letter was treated as a “Public Interest Litigation”, in terms of an order dated 17[th] October, 2016, passed by a Division Bench of this Court headed by the then Chief Justice. Thereafter, the matter was heard from time to time and several orders had been passed.

After hearing the submissions made by the learned advocates for the parties today, it appears that in the meanwhile steps have been taken by the acquiring authority, namely, the District Collector, North Sikkim, for acquisition of the land in question in accordance with law. Since acquisition proceedings have already been initiated in accordance with law, no further directions are required to be passed in the instant Public Interest Litigation which stands disposed of with a direction to the appropriate authority of the Central jk/ds/avi Government to ensure that, in the meanwhile, hiring charges are paid regularly to those individual landowners in terms of the undertaking in the form of an affidavit given to the Court, earlier.

(Meenakshi Madan Rai) Judge

(Biswanath Somadder) Chief Justice

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead