Sikkim High Court

Arb.P./2/2024 of CB Hang Yaku Rai Vs M/s A.K. Builders on 3 December 2024

COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK Record of Proceedings Page 1 of 2 Arb.P. No. 02/2024 MR. CB HANG YAKU RAI PETITIONER (S) VERSUS M/S A.K. BUILDERS RESPONDENT (S) For Petitioner : Mr. M. N. Dhungel, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Mr. Adarsh Gurung and Ms. Gazala Parvin, Advocates. Date:

Arb.P. No. 02/2024

MR. CB HANG YAKU RAI PETITIONER (S) VERSUS M/S A.K. BUILDERS RESPONDENT (S)

For Petitioner : Mr. M. N. Dhungel, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Mr. Adarsh Gurung and Ms. Gazala Parvin, Advocates.

Date: 03/12/2024

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE …

O R D E R

This is an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (as amended till date), for appointment of an Arbitrator.

Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and upon perusing the instant application, this Court is of the view that there is an arbitrable dispute which has arisen and which requires adjudication by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a sole Arbitrator.

During the course of hearing, this Court asked the learned Advocates of both parties to name any learned Senior Advocate of this Court who could be nominated as the learned sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the dispute between the parties. Both the learned Advocates have come up with one common name; that of a designated Senior Advocate of this Court, namely, Shri Asutosh Moulik.

Mr. Moulik may be appointed as a sole Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes which may have arisen between the parties. It will be open to the learned Arbitrator to select the venue of arbitration and also determine his fees as well as the required fees/charges for secretarial assistance. The learned Arbitrator may initiate the arbitral proceeding as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from date of communication of a jk/ab/ami photostat certified copy of this order. The learned Arbitrator is also requested to conclude the arbitral proceeding within a reasonable period of time.

Since no affidavits were called for, allegations made in the instant arbitration petition shall be deemed to have been not admitted by the respondents.

The application is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Biswanath Somadder) Chief Justice

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead