Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/24470/2019 of DHEERAJ MOHANIYA Vs MADHYA PRADESH STATE INFROMATION COMMISSION on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARION THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 24470 of 2019
BETWEEN:-
DHEERAJ MOHANIYA S/O SHRI OMPRAKASHMOHANIYA, AGED 41 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS,63/5, PARDESHIPURA INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
(SHRI HEMENDRA JAIN, COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER).
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.MADHYA PRADESH STATE INFORMATIONCOMMISSION, THROUGH COMMISSIONER,STATE INFORMATION, 35-A, SUCHANA BHAWANARERA HILLS BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)COMMISSION, THROUGH COMMISSIONER,STATE INFORMATION, 35-A, SUCHANA BHAWANARERA HILLS BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY, (THROUGH CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER) UNDER RIGHT TOINFORMATION ACT 2005, ATAL INDORE CITYTRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED, PLOT NO. 30,RESIDENCY ARERA, A.B. ROAD, OPP.M.G.M.MEDICAL COLLEGE, INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)EXECUTIVE OFFICER) UNDER RIGHT TOINFORMATION ACT 2005, ATAL INDORE CITYTRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED, PLOT NO. 30,RESIDENCY ARERA, A.B. ROAD, OPP.M.G.M.MEDICAL COLLEGE, INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, ATAL INDORECITY TRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED, PLOT NO.30, RESIDENCY AREA, A.B. ROAD, OPP. M.G.M.MEDICAL COLLEGE INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)CITY TRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED, PLOT NO.30, RESIDENCY AREA, A.B. ROAD, OPP. M.G.M.MEDICAL COLLEGE INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI SHASHWAT SETH, COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1).(MS. ASHI VAIDYA, PANEL LAWYER FOR THE STATE).(SHRI ASHUTOSH GONDIL, COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3).
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdrawthis petition with liberty to file afresh, if occasion so arise.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with theaforesaid liberty.
vidya
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)JUDGE