Sikkim High Court
Cont. Cas(C)/1/2020 of Md. Nasiruddin Ansari Vs State of Sikkim and ors. on 15 October 2020
OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing Page-1 of 2 Cont. Cas(C) No.01 of 2020 MD. NASIRUDDIN ANSARI …PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. …RESPONDENTS Date: 15.10.2020 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE … O R D E R
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Cont. Cas(C) No.01 of 2020
MD. NASIRUDDIN ANSARI
…PETITIONER
STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS.
VERSUS
…RESPONDENTS
Date: 15.10.2020
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
…
O R D ER(O R A L)
Heard Mr. N. B. Khatiwada, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Gita Bista for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Pema Bhutia, learned State Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 4 and Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Rachhitta Rai, for respondent nos.2 & 3.
This contempt petition is filed alleging willful violation of the order of this Court dated 04/12/2019 passed in WP(C) No. 52/2018.
The petition is filed without arraying the persons who had willfully and deliberately violated the order of this Court by name. The respondents are arrayed by designation. A post may be held by different incumbents at different points of time. Allegations of willful and deliberate violation of an order of the court can be brought only against a person and not against a post.
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI
Digitally signed by ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI Date: 2020.10.15 14:38:56 +05'30'
Confronted with the aforesaid situation, Mr. Khatiwada submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to file a fresh contempt petition.
pm/
At this juncture, Mr. Upadhyaya submits that this contempt petition is not maintainable because of non-compliance of Rule 175 of the Sikkim High Court (Practice & Procedure) Rules, 2011. However, in view of the prayer made by Mr. Khatiwada, this aspect of the matter is not gone into.
Considering the matter in its entirety, for ends of justice, this contempt petition is closed and disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court by way of filing a fresh contempt petition.
Digitally signed by ARUP KUMAR ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI GOSWAMIDate: 2020.10.15 14:39:15 +05'30'
Chief Justice
Approved for Reporting: Yes