Sikkim High Court
WA/4/2018 of Dawa Phuti Bhutia and Ors. Vs State Of Sikkim and others on 17 August 2021
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing WA No. 04/2018 DAWA PHUTI BHUTIA AND ORS. APPELLANT (S) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. RESPONDENT (S) For Appellants : Md. Suvani, Appellant no. 24 in-person Mr. Majibul Rehman, Appellant no. 23 in-person For Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WA No. 04/2018
DAWA PHUTI BHUTIA AND ORS. APPELLANT (S)
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS.
RESPONDENT (S)
For Appellants : Md. Suvani, Appellant no. 24 in-person Mr. Majibul Rehman, Appellant no. 23 in-person Mr. Majibul Rehman, Appellant no. 23 in-person For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate. Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate.
For Respondent No.2
:
Mr. Jorgay Namka, Advocate
For Respondents No. 3 to 5
:
Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Advocate
Date: 17/08/2021
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
…
PER J.K. MAHESHWARI, CJ
Md. Suvani is present in the Court. He has produced his Adhaar Card to show his identity and on perusal of his Adhaar Card his identity is confirmed.
Let a photocopy of identity card along with his appearance sheet be kept on record.
It is to note here that appellant No. 24 was having power of attorney for appellants No. 1 to 23 to contest the matter and accordingly, he has signed the Vakalatnama as power of attorney on behalf of all the appellants.
After issuance of the special process card, he is present today. He has stated across the Bar that he does not wish to press this appeal on behalf of all the appellants. SPC was issued to all the appellants for their appearance today but no one is present except appellant no.23 & 24, representing all.
In view of the said statement, learned Counsel representing the respondents having no objection in withdrawal of this Writ Appeal. Accordingly, the withdrawal of Writ Appeal is allowed.
In view of the foregoing, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.