Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/46303/2018 of AMIT VARMA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2018
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC.46303/2018 (Amit Varma Vs. The State of
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHMCRC.46303/2018
(Amit Varma Vs. The State of M.P. )
Jabalpur, Dated : 31.12.2018
Shri Balram Koshta, counsel for the applicant.
Ms. Namrata K. Agrawal, G.A. for the respondent / State.
Heard with the aid of case diary.
This is First application of the applicant Amit Varma filedunder section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in connection with CrimeNo. 278/2018 registered at Police Station Junnardeo, DistrictChhindwara for the offence punishable under Sections 460, 307 /34IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, on 21.07.2018 at 1:30 pmapplicant and other co-accused Maksud Khan went to complainant-Ameen Khan’s house situated at village Majhari, Junnardeo andassaulted him by knife with intention to kill and when his wife Neelucame to rescue, they also assaulted her.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant hasnot committed any offence and has falsely been implicated in theoffence. The applicant is in custody since 21.07.2018 and theconclusion of trial is likely to take long time, hence prayed forrelease of the applicant on bail.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer andsubmitted that sufficient evidence is available on record to connectthe applicant with the offence in question so he should not bereleased on bail.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and as tothe fact that the applicant is in custody since 21.07.2018, andconclusion of trial is likely to take long time, he has no criminal pastwithout commenting on the merits of the case, the application isallowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail upon hisfurnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. FiftyThousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to thesatisfaction of the concerned C.J.M/trial Court for his appearance sarathe THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC.46303/2018
(Amit Varma Vs. The State of M.P. )
before the trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the trial Court during the pendency of trial.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions ofthe bond executed by him; the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as thecase may be; case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extendinginducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted withthe fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing suchfacts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted withthe fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing suchfacts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to theoffence of which he is accused; offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments duringthe trial; and the trial; and
6. The applicant will not leave India without previouspermission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the casemay be. permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the casemay be.
C.C. on payment of usual charges.
(Rajeev Kumar Dubey)
V. Judge
Digitally signed by NAVEEN KUMAR SARATHE Date: 2018.12.31 18:29:29 +05'30'