Madhya Pradesh High Court
CONC/5875/2023 of PRABHUDAYAL PANAGRE Vs SHRI RINKESH KUMAR VAISHYA on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 5875 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
PRABHUDAYAL PANAGRE S/O SHRI K.L. PANAGRE,AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION: JUNIORENGINEER R/O B-8/20, BASANT VIHAR COLONY, UJJAINDISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI RAHUL PANCHAL - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SHRI RINKESH KUMAR VAISHYA, CGM (HR) M.P.PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.MANAGING DIRECTOR GPH COMPOUNDPOLOGROUND, INDORE DISTRICT INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.MANAGING DIRECTOR GPH COMPOUNDPOLOGROUND, INDORE DISTRICT INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.SHRI SANJAY MALVIYA, JOINT SECRETARY MPPASCHIM KSEHTRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.O/O MANAGING DIRECTOR GPH COMPOUNDPOLOGROUND INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)PASCHIM KSEHTRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.O/O MANAGING DIRECTOR GPH COMPOUNDPOLOGROUND INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.SHRI RAJESH CHANDRA JAIN SUPERINTENDINGENGINEER (O AND M) M.P. PASCHIM KSHETRAVIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. DEWAS CIRCLE, NEARBHOPAL CHOURAHA, OPP. SHRISTI HOTEL,DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)ENGINEER (O AND M) M.P. PASCHIM KSHETRAVIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. DEWAS CIRCLE, NEARBHOPAL CHOURAHA, OPP. SHRISTI HOTEL,DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI PRASANNA PRASAD - ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
report has been filed before this Court and the order passed by this Court hasbeen duly complied with.
2. Counsel for the petitioner is satisfied that the order passed by thisCourt has been duly complied with and nothing is remained in this contemptpetition.
3. In view of the compliance report, this contempt petition is disposed ofaccordingly.
trilok
(ANIL VERMA)JUDGE