Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCC/216/2024 of SUBHASH SHUKLA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 216 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

SUBHASH SHUKLA S/O JAGDEO PRASAD SHUKLA,AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, JHUGGI NO. 196 BHIM NAGARBHOPAL R/O AMAIHA BEHIND GALLA MANDI POLICESTATION CIVIL LINE REWA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYAPRADESH)

(BY SHRI K.S. THAKUR - ADVOCATE)

.....APPLICANT

AND

1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHTHE SECRETARY LABOUR DEPARTMENTVALLABH BHAWAN MANTRALAYA BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)THE SECRETARY LABOUR DEPARTMENTVALLABH BHAWAN MANTRALAYA BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)

2.THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER MADHYAPRADESH GOVT. INDORE DISTRICT INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)PRADESH GOVT. INDORE DISTRICT INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)

3.SHRI P.N. TIWARI LABOUR OFFICER OFFICE OFTHE LABOUR OFFICER DISTRICT OFFICE REWA(MADHYA PRADESH)THE LABOUR OFFICER DISTRICT OFFICE REWA(MADHYA PRADESH)

4.ASSTT. LABOUR COMMISSIONER SATNA (REWA)DIVISION SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)DIVISION SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard on I.A. No.1295/2024, which is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.

2. Registry has reported this MCC to be barred by 183 days.

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by anaffidavit of the applicant, there is sufficient cause for condoning the delay infiling of the M.C.C. As such, delay in filing the M.C.C. is hereby condonedand I.A. No.1295/2024 is allowed/closed.

4. Heard on the question of admission.

5. The present application has been filed for restoration ofW.P.No.24522/2003, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 19.06.2023.

6. Considering the averments made in the application, this Court finds thatsufficient cause is shown for restoration of the writ petition. Accordingly, MCC

is allowed.

7. W.P.No.24522/2003 is restored to its original number subject to payment ofcost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand) within a period of 7 working dayspayable to the State Legal Services Authority, Jabalpur.

8 . The payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- shall be a condition precedent for restoration of W.P.No.24522/2003.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off

10. A copy of this order be kept in the file of W.P.No.24522/2003.

ss

(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead