Madhya Pradesh High Court
CRR/2090/2022 of MAHENDRA SINGH DODIYA Vs SMT. SNEHA DODIYA on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2090 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1.MAHENDRA SINGH DODIYA S/O SHRI INDERSINGH SINGH DODIYA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE HIG 13DEENDAYALPURAM COLONY KHANDWA P.S.MOGHAT ROAD KHANDWA (MADHYA PRADESH)SINGH SINGH DODIYA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE HIG 13DEENDAYALPURAM COLONY KHANDWA P.S.MOGHAT ROAD KHANDWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.SMT. POORNA DODIYA W/O SHRI MAHENDRASINGH DODIYA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/OHIG 13 DEENDAYALPURAM COLONY KHANDWAP.S MOHGHAT ROAD (MADHYA PRADESH)SINGH DODIYA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/OHIG 13 DEENDAYALPURAM COLONY KHANDWAP.S MOHGHAT ROAD (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI V.S.CHOUDHARY - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SMT. SNEHA DODIYA W/O LATE SHRI ABHIRAJSINGH DODIYA D/O SHRI PRITAM SINGHCHOUHAN S/O LATE SHRI JAGANNATH SINGH,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 553/8 ATAL DWAR, I/F OFHANUMAN MANDIR NEHRU NAGAR INDORE P.S.MIG INDORE DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)SINGH DODIYA D/O SHRI PRITAM SINGHCHOUHAN S/O LATE SHRI JAGANNATH SINGH,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 553/8 ATAL DWAR, I/F OFHANUMAN MANDIR NEHRU NAGAR INDORE P.S.MIG INDORE DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.RUDRAKSH SINGH S/O LATE SHRI ABHIRAJSINGH DODIYA, AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, R/O 553/8ATAL DWAR I/F OF HANUMAN MANDIR NEHRUNAGAR INDORE P.S MIG INDORE DISTRICT(MADHYA PRADESH)SINGH DODIYA, AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, R/O 553/8ATAL DWAR I/F OF HANUMAN MANDIR NEHRUNAGAR INDORE P.S MIG INDORE DISTRICT(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI ASHUTOSH JOSHI - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No.1)
This revision coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays forwithdrawal of this revision with liberty to approach the concerning Court underthe Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
Prayer allowed.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty asprayed for.
AM
(VISHAL MISHRA)JUDGE