Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/1932/2024 of PUNIT PANDEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR PALIWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 3941 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
DILIP KOL S/O SHRI VISHRAM KOL, AGED ABOUT 33YEAR S , OCCUPATION: LABOUR R/O LALGAWAN,POLICE STATION GARH, REWA, DISTRICT REWA(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI MANOJ KUSHWAHA - ADVOCATE)
.....APPLICANT
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICESTATION CIVIL LINE DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI VIVEK LAKHERA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENT
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 1932 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
PUNIT PANDEY S/O SHRI VINOD PANDEY, AGED ABOUT30 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER RESIDENT OFVILLAGE JAMUNA TAHSIL AMARPATAN POLICESTATION TALA, SATNA DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI MANISH DATT - SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH SHRI SHUBHAMMISHRA - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICESTATION CIVIL LINE DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI VIVEK LAKHERA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENT
These applications coming on for admission this day, the court passedthe following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
These are the repeat applications; third application filed by applicantDilip Kol (M.Cr.C. No.3941 of 2024) and fourth application filed by applicantPunit Pandey (M.Cr.C. No.1932 of 2024) under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. forgrant of regular bail relating to FIR No.62/2023 dated 28.01.2023, registered atPolice Station Civil Lines, Satna, District Satna (M.P.) for commission ofoffence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 474, 120-B of IPC. ApplicantDilip Kol is in detention since 30.01.2023 and applicant Punit Pandey is indetention since 29.01.2023.
2. First bail application of applicant Dilip Kol was dismissed on meritvide order dated 19.06.2023 passed in M.Cr.C. No.23821 of 2023 and hissecond bail application was dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed vide orderdated 09.01.2024 passed in M.Cr.C. No.53232 of 2023. First & third bailapplications of applicant Punit Pandey were dismissed as withdrawn and notpressed vide orders dated 25.03.2023 & 10.10.2023 passed in M.Cr.C.No.12168 of 2023 & M.Cr.C. No.25278 of 2023 respectively and his secondbail application was dismissed on merit vide order dated 02.05.2023 passed inM.Cr.C. No.16415 of 2023.
3. As prayed by learned counsel for the applicants, these repeatapplications too under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail filed on behalfof applicants - Dilip Kol and Punit Pandey are dismissed as withdrawn andnot pressed.
4. However, as prayed by learned counsel for the applicants, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the pace of trial and to conclude it expeditiouslypreferably within a period of six months from today or from the date ofproduction/receipt of certified copy of this order.
5. It is made clear that if trial is not concluded within the aforesaidperiod, applicants shall be at liberty to renew the prayer for grant of bail.
6. Registry is directed to inform the concerned trial Court throughSession Judge, Satna by transmitting a copy of this order.
@shish
(DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL)JUDGE