Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./2/2024 of PRANAB BORAH Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 29 January 2024
No. 05 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 2 of 2024 Date of Order: 29.01.2024 Shri. Pranab Borah Vs. State of Meghalaya Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. B. Snaitang, Adv.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 05 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 2 of 2024
Shri. Pranab Borah
Date of Order: 29.01.2024Vs. State of Meghalaya Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. B. Snaitang, Adv. Mr. S. Khyriem, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG. with Ms. R. Colney, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORAL: 1. Heard Mr. K. Paul, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that this Court vide order dated 15.12.2023 passed in BA. No. 64 of 2023, had granted interim bail to the petitioner for the purpose of undergoing treatment. Accordingly, in compliance thereof, the petitioner was subsequently admitted at Down Town Hospital, Guwahati and was discharged on 22.01.2024. However, in the discharge certificate, it is the opinion of the attending doctor that the case of the petitioner be reviewed after 10(ten) days.
2. This being the case, the learned senior counsel has submitted that the interim bail granted may be extended for a further period of 12(twelve) days from today to enable the petitioner to get his case reviewed at the said hospital, since the period granted by this Court vide the said order dated 15.12.2023 expires today.
3. Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG appearing on behalf of the State respondent has submitted that this application may be put on hold and the same to be taken up after 10(ten) days following a report to be filed by the petitioner as far as his case of review before the said hospital is concerned.
4. This Court, on consideration of the submission made, and on perusal of the documents annexed to the application, is satisfied that the petitioner is indeed required for review of his case at the said hospital.
5. On this ground, the prayer for extension is hereby allowed. The interim bail being granted to the petitioner is extended for a further period of 12(twelve) days from today. At the end of the 12(twelve) days’ period, the petitioner is directed to report to the District Prisons and Correctional Home, Shillong.
6. In view of the above, this application is accordingly disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya
29.01.2024 “D. Nary, PS”