Madhya Pradesh High Court
MA/205/2019 of ABDUL REHMAN THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY MUNAF KHAN Vs SUGRABAI on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESHON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. APPEAL No. 205 of 2019
BETWEEN:-
ABDUL REHMAN THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEYMUNAF KHAN S/O ABDUL REHMAN, AGED ABOUT 59YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE KALALI MOHALLA,ALLAWALA MARG, GALI NO. 1, KHARGONE (MADHYAPRADESH)
(NONE APPEARED FOR APPELLANT).
.....APPELLANT
AND
1.SUGRABAI W/O GULAM HUSAIN, AGED ABOUT 62YE A R S , OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD KALALIMOHALLA, ALLAWALA MARG, GALI NO. 1,KHARGONE (MADHYA PRADESH)YE A R S , OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD KALALIMOHALLA, ALLAWALA MARG, GALI NO. 1,KHARGONE (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.RAJIYA BI W/O EHSAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,OCCUPATION: HOUSE HOLD KALALI MOHALLA,OCCUPATION: HOUSE HOLD KALALI MOHALLA, ALLAWALA MARG, GALI NO. 1, KHARGONE(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE APPEARED FOR RESPONDENT).
.....RESPONDENTS
This appeal coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
No one appears for the parties. Even on the last dates of hearing i.e. on09.01.2020 & 07.02.2020 no one had appeared on behalf of the appellant. Itappears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly,appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(HIRDESH)JUDGE