Meghalaya High Court

MC(WPC)/147/2025 of THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL AND 3 ORS. Vs RAKESH RANJAN MISHRA on 3 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 14 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)] No. 147 of 2025 in WP(C) No. 427 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 1. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, 9 Deen Dayal Upadhaya Marg, New Delhi – 110124. 2. The Principal Accountant General (Audit), Meghalaya,

Serial No. 14 Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG

MC[WP(C)] No. 147 of 2025 in WP(C) No. 427 of 2024

Date of Decision: 03.09.2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, India, 9 Deen Dayal Upadhaya Marg, New Delhi – 110124. New Delhi – 110124.

2. The Principal Accountant General (Audit), Meghalaya, Shillong- 793001. (Audit), Meghalaya, Shillong- 793001.

3. The Deputy Accountant General (Admin), O/o the Principal Accountant General (Audit), Meghalaya, Shillong – 793001. (Admin), O/o the Principal Accountant General (Audit), Meghalaya, Shillong – 793001.

4. The Establishment Officer, Office of the Principal Accountant General (Audit) Meghalaya, Shillong. Principal Accountant General (Audit) Meghalaya, Shillong.

Represented by SMTI DHANLAXMI CHOURASIADaughter of Ramesh Chourasia now aged about 41 years, resident of Lyndhurst Estate, Laitumkhrah Shillong – 793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

SMTI DHANLAXMI CHOURASIA,

……….. Applicants

-Vs-

SHRI. RAKESH RANJAN MISHRA,

Aged about 44 years,

Son of Shri. Sachchida Nand Mishra Permanent resident of Vill- Kathitanr Chowk, Resident of Ranchi, Jharkhand.

………… Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Ms. E.B. Passah, Adv. vice Mr. K. Kharmawphlang, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Nath, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Yes/No Per W. Diengdoh, (J):

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Ms. E.B. Passah, learned counsel is present on behalf of the applicants.

2. Mr. S. Nath, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made by the applicant for amendment of the cause title in the main petition, wherein the name of the original Petitioner No. 1, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is to be replaced by the Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General (Dy. CAG).

3. Accordingly, on consideration of the submission made, this Court hereby allows this application and the name of the Petitioner No. 1, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is hereby replaced by the Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General (Dy. CAG).

4. The applicant is directed to take steps for amendment of the cause title.

5. Misc. Case stands disposed of.

(B. Bhattacharjee) Judge Judge

(W. Diengdoh)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead