Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./118/2024 of SHANBORLANG THABAH Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 13 November 2024
Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 118 of 2024 Date of Order: 13.11.2024 Shri. Shanborlang Thabah Son of Shri. Chandrabose Lyngdoh Nonglait of Mawlangren Village, P.S: Mairang, Eastern West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya, Presently lodged in District Prisons and
Serial No. 02 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 118 of 2024
Date of Order: 13.11.2024
Shri. Shanborlang Thabah Son of Shri. Chandrabose Lyngdoh Nonglait ofMawlangren Village,P.S: Mairang, Eastern West KhasiHills District, Meghalaya,Presently lodged in District Prisonsand Correctional Home, Shillong.
:::::Applicant
-Vs-
The State of MeghalayaRepresented by Commissioner &Secretary Home, Shillong:::::Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:For the Petitioner/Applicant(s): Mr. S. Pandit, Adv.For the Respondent(s): Mr. K. Khan, PP. withMr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl. Sr. GA.
Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.
ORAL:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. S. Pandit, learned counsel for the applicant, who hassubmitted that the related appeal filed by the applicant is delayed by 400days on the ground that the convict is unable to procure the funds toengage a counsel, and also for the lack of support of his family members,and as such, the delay of 400 days has occurred in filing the appeal, forwhich prayer for condonation of the same is made.
2. Mr. K. Khan, learned PP assisted by Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang,learned Addl. Sr. GA appearing for the State respondent, on considerationof the fact that the appeal has been preferred by the convict, there is nostrong objection to the prayer made for condonation of delay.
3. This Court on consideration of the submission made, finds thatthe delay has been suitably explained. Accordingly, this application isallowed and the delay of 400 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
4. Misc. Case stands disposed of.
5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.
(B. Bhattacharjee)
(W. Diengdoh)
Judge Judge