Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/226/2021 of NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. Vs MEGHALAYA MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR. on 29 September 2023
No. 14 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 226 of 2021 Date of Decision: 29.09.2023 National Buildings Construction Vs. Meghalaya Micro Small Enterprises Corporation Ltd. Facilitation Council & Anr. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For
Serial No. 14 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 226 of 2021
Date of Decision: 29.09.2023
National Buildings Construction Vs. Meghalaya Micro Small Enterprises Corporation Ltd. Facilitation Council & Anr. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, JudgeAppearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Sen, Adv. with Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Adv. Mr. A. Momin, Adv. (For R 1) Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, Adv. (For R 2) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. S. Sen, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 1 as well as Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2.
2. Mr. Sen has brought on record copy of the relevant order dated 22.09.2023 wherein by the said order the Meghalaya Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council on consideration of the dispute between the relevant parties, particularly the respondent No. 2 herein and the petitioner has in essence disposed of the same on the claim being withdrawn.
3. Without going into the merits of the matter the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Philemon Nongbri has submitted that vide the said order dated 22.09.2023 grievances of the petitioner has been attended to and as such, nothing survives in this petition for agitation. It is, therefore, submitted that in view of the said aforementioned order, this petition may be disposed of accordingly.
4. On consideration of the submission made, the said order produced before this Court today is taken on board. The same shall be marked as Annexure-X and form part of these records.
5. On submission made, this petition is hereby disposed of as infructuous.
Judge
Meghalaya 29.09.2023 “Tiprilynti–PS”