Meghalaya High Court

AB/50/2023 of SOFIQUL MARTHONG Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANOTHER on 12 September 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 50 of 2023 Date of Decision: 12.09.2023 Shri. Sofiqul Marthong Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. P. Nongbri, Adv. Mr. M.L.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Serial No. 01 Supplementary List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

AB. No. 50 of 2023

Date of Decision: 12.09.2023Shri. Sofiqul MarthongVs. State of Meghalaya & Anr.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, JudgeAppearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. P. Nongbri, Adv. Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. T. Yangi. B, AAG. with Ms. R. Colney, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORDER (ORAL)1. Heard Mr. P. Nongbri, learned counsel for the petitioner who has submitted that the petitioner herein is deemed to be involved in connection with Shallang P.S. Case No. 39 (12) 2022 under Sections 188/34/379/120B IPC read with Section 3(1)/21(1) MMDR Act, read with Section 15 Environment (Protection) Act and Section 3 Explosive Substances Act, wherein he was served with a notice dated 29.05.2023 under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Investigating Officer and in compliance thereto, he had appeared before the said Investigating Officer on 13.06.2023. However, in due course, the petitioner apprehends that the police might arrest him in connection with the said Shallang P.S. Case (supra) as was done in the case of other co-accused who were served with notices under Section 41-A and were eventually arrested. It is this apprehension of arrest that has compelled the petitioner to approach this Court with this instant application.

2. The learned counsel has also submitted that the subject matter herein was taken note of by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 28879/2023, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 07.08.2023 had directed the petitioners therein to approach the Full Bench of this Court for prayer seeking grant of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the said petitioners on approaching this Court with relevant applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C, the Full Bench of this Court on the application so made, vide order dated 29.08.2023, has allowed such applications and prayer made, thereby granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioners therein. It is further submitted that the petitioner herein being similarly situated, applying the principle of parity, prayer is accordingly made for grant of pre-arrest bail.

3. Mrs. T. Yangi. B, learned AAG appearing on behalf of the State respondents has no objection to the prayer made on the ground that the case of the petitioner herein is covered by the relevant order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Full Bench of this Court and also by a number of similar and identical orders made by this Court.

4. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is hereby allowed. In the event of his arrest in connection with the said Shallang P.S. Case No. 39

(12) 2022, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on the following conditions that:

i) He shall not abscond or tamper with the evidence or witnesses;

ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation and in this regard, shall furnish his mobile phone number wherewith, he shall or may be contacted at all times, if so required; or may be contacted at all times, if so required;

iii) He shall not leave the jurisdiction of the State of Meghalaya except with prior permission of the Investigating Officer or the court concerned, if he has to go beyond such jurisdiction and jurisdiction and

iv) He shall bind himself with a personal bond of ₹ 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) only with one solvent surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority or the court concerned.

5. In view of the above, AB. No. 50 of 2023 is accordingly disposed of.

Judge

Meghalaya

12.09.2023 “D. Nary, PS”

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead