Meghalaya High Court
Crl.Petn./30/2018 of NIYANTA PURKAYASTHA Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (ACB) SHILLONG on 20 March 2024
No. 15 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. Petn. No. 30 of 2018 Date of Decision: 20.03.2024 Shri. Niyanta Purkayastha, Son of (L) Nagendra Kumar Purkayastha, Resident of Flat No. A -2, First Floor, Bimal Enclaves, P.P. Road, Rehabari Guwahati-781008
Serial No. 15 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl. Petn. No. 30 of 2018
Date of Decision: 20.03.2024
Shri. Niyanta Purkayastha, Son of (L) Nagendra Kumar Purkayastha, Resident of Flat No. A-2, First Floor, Bimal Enclaves, P.P. Road, Rehabari Guwahati-781008
………..Petitioner
-Versus-
The Superintendent of Central Bureau of Investigation, (ACB), Shillong.
……...Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. K.Ch. Gautam, Adv. Ms. R. Kharshiing, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. K. Gurung, Adv.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Mr. K.Ch. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner in this case is since deceased and the factum of his death has been brought to the attention of this Court by way of affidavit dated 02.08.2022 wherein the death certificate was also enclosed. This being the case, the learned counsel would submit that this matter may be disposed of as not prosecuted.
2. Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made but has however, prayed before this Court that while disposing of this instant petition, the factum of death of the petitioner may be brought to the notice of the trial court by the parties concerned.
3. Accordingly, on consideration of such prayer made, this petition is hereby disposed of as infructuous.
4. Needless to say, as has been submitted by the learned DSGI, the learned counsel for the petitioner or the legal heirs or legal representatives of the deceased petitioner are directed to inform the trial court of such fact.
Judge
Meghalaya 20.03.2024 “Tiprilynti–PS”