Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/21302/2022 of AJAY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARION THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 21302 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
AJAY S/O LATE SHRI ASHOK BORASI, AGED ABOUT 28YEARS, OCCUPATION: HAMMALI 127/1 CHOTIKUMHARKHEDI BANGANGA INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
(NONE FOR THE PETTIONER )
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPALSECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)2.SHRIMAN POLICE AAYUKT MAHODAY POLICEAAYUKT KARYALAY DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)3.SHRIMAN POLICE ADHIKSHAK MAHODAY.(PURV) POLICE ADHIKSHAK OFFICE INDORE.(MADHYA PRADESH)4.POLICE THANA PRABHARI MAHODAY POLICETHANA BANGANGA. INDORE. (MADHYAPRADESH)5.SHRIMAN SUB INSPECTOR SHARDHA PAWARMEDAM POLICE THANA BANGANGA INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
( SHRI BHUWAN DESHMUKH - GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR THERESPONDENTS/STATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
'' सहायता
यािचकाकता क ओरसेसादनिनवेदनहैिक-
अ.यहिक, यािचकाकता केप म एवंिवप ी .4 सेलगायत 5 केिव���रटजारीक जाएिकयािचकाकता काप��न रंकुबौरासी ारािदनॉंक 01.03.2022 कोपु लसथानाबाणगंगााम िदयेगयेआवेदनप क नकलअिवलंबिन:शुल्क दानकरवाईजावेा ब.यहिकिवप ी . 2 सेलगायत 5 केिव��कारणबताओसूचनाप जारीिकयाजावेा स.यहिकयािचकाकता केप म एवंिवप ी .4 एवं 5 केिव��मान सक ताड.नादेनेएवंजीवनवस्वतं तावसुर ाकाहननकरनेएवंनकलकेकारणहजा नाअ ोिपतिकयाजाऐएवं ितपूित िदलवायेजावेा द.यहिकसहायताको करणक प र��थितय कोदेखतेह एअन्यकोईसहायताजोमाननीयन्यायालययािचकाकता कोिदलवानाआवश्यकसमझेिदलवाईजावेा''
At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent/State submittedthat alternative efficacious remedy of filing an appeal u/S 19 of the Right toInformation Act, 2005 is available to the petitioner and without availing theaforesaid remedy, he has approached this Court. Hence, the present petition isnot maintainable and liable to be dismissed.
This Court finds force in the submission of learned counsel for the Stateas regards maintainability of petition and, therefore, is not inclined to entertainthe same.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner isat liberty to avail the remedy under the Act of 2005 in accordance with law.
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)
JUDGE