Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/8541/2011 of SATYANARAYAN Vs PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND 2 ORS. on 5 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 5[th] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 8541 of 2011
BETWEEN:-
SATYANARAYAN S/O MURLIDHAR JOSHI, AGED ABOUT60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETD.D/112,ALKAPURI,RATLAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
RETD.
(BY SHRI L.R. BHATNAGAR - ADVOCATE)
AND
1.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYAPRADESH AND 2 ORS. GOVT. SCHOOLEDUCATION DEPT.,VALLABH BHAWAN,BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)PRADESH AND 2 ORS. GOVT. SCHOOLEDUCATION DEPT.,VALLABH BHAWAN,BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
2.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (MADHYAPRADESH)PRADESH)
3.JOINT DIRECTOR TREASURE, ACCOUNTS ANDPENSION (MADHYA PRADESH)PENSION (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI KOUSTUBH PATHAK - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
In the present petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction to consider therepresentation of the petitioner for grant of leave encashment for 300 days afterhis retirement on the post of Heard Clerk in accordance with the M.P. CivilServices (Leave) Rules 1977.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the identical petition of Chaganlal Kakrecha vs. State of MP & Ors. (W.P. No.4787/2005) hasalready been decided by this Court on 22.01.2007 and the representation of thepetitioner may be directed to be considered as per the Circular dated08.03.2019 and as per the judgment of Chaganlal Kakrecha (supra).
3 . After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper todispose off the petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a freshrepresentation along with the judgment passed in the case of ChaganlalKakrecha (supra) and also copy of the order passed today within a period of15 days from today and if such representation is submitted, the same shall beconsidered and decided by the Competent Authority in accordance with the lawkeeping in mind the judgment passed by this Court in the case of ChaganlalKakrecha (supra) and Circular dated 08.03.2019 within a period of 8 weeksfrom the date of submission of the representation.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
5. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed off.
Certified copy as per rules.
jyoti
(PRANAY VERMA)
JUDGE