Meghalaya High Court
Crl.Petn./8/2024 of JAYANTA BARMAN Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS. on 18 July 2024
List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn No. 8 of 2024 Date of Order: 18.07.2024 ____________________________________________________________ Shri. Jayanta Barman Vs. 1.State of Meghalaya Son of (L) S. Barman Represented by the Commissioner Resident of H/No 04, and Secretary, (Home)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No.01 Supple List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl.Petn No. 8 of 2024
Date of Order: 18.07.2024
____________________________________________________________
Shri. Jayanta BarmanSon of (L) S. BarmanResident of H/No 04, DPI Kahilipara Road,K.K.H., Nagarm Kahilipara,Guwahati Kahilipara,Kamrup Metro, Assam – 781019.
Vs. 1.State of Meghalaya Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, (Home) PoliceDepartment Government of Meghalaya.
2. Officer-in-ChargeMawlai Plice StationEast Khasi Hills District.Meghalaya.
…Petitioner.
3. M/s Pyngrope Agencies,Having its office at G.S. Road, Mawlai Nongkwar, Block 13, Shillong, Meghalaya – 793017Represented by its proprietorSmti. Teresa PyngropeWife of Hemant GuptaResident of Flat No. 10, Rynjah,Shillong, Meghalaya – 793006.
4. Shri. Hemant Gupta.Son of (L) Sachintanand GuptaResident of Flat No. 10, Rynjah,Shillong, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya – 793006.
…Respondents.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. B. F. Kharwanlang, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. Sr.GA.(R: 1 & 2) Mr. K. Ch. Gautam, Adv. (R: 3 & 4)
ORAL:-
Heard Ms. B.F. Kharwanlang, learned Counsel appearing for thepetitioner, Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. Sr. GA appearing for the State-respondents No. 1 & 2 and also Mr. K. Ch. Gautam, learned Counselappearing for the respondents No.3 & 4.
This is an application under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking quashing ofthe FIRs dated 21-12-2023 and 13-02-2023 lodged by the respondent No.4and also the proceeding of the Mawlai PS Case No. 03(01) of 2024 whichwas registered on the basis of the aforesaid FIRs.
The learned Counsels for the petitioner and the respondents No.3 & 4submit that the dispute between the parties which resulted in theregistration of the Mawlai PS Case No. 03(01) of 2024 has been settled andthe parties have entered into an agreement of settlement dated 27-06-2024.The agreement has been brought into the record of this Court by anaffidavit filed by the respondent No.4. It is also submitted by the learnedCounsels that the FIRs dated 21-12-2023 and 13-02-2023 and theproceeding of Mawlai PS Case No. 03(01) of 2024 registered under Section500 IPC may be quashed on the basis of the said agreement of settlement.
The learned Addl. Sr. GA for the State-respondents No.1 & 2 doesnot dispute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and therespondents No. 3 & 4. He further submits that he has also no objection tothe prayer made by them for quashing.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
In view of the submissions made, the FIRs dated 21-12-2023 and 13-02-2023 and the proceeding of Mawlai PS Case No. 03(01) of 2024 standquashed.
The criminal petition is allowed.
Judge
Meghalaya18.07.2024“Biswarup PS”
Signature Not Verified