Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/13167/2016 of JITENDRA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 29-12-2016 Shri D.S.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

MCRC-13167-2016

(JITENDRAVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

29-12-2016

Shri D.S. Patel, learned counsel for the applicant.Ms. Mamta Shandilya, learned counsel forrespondent/State.

Case-diary is available. Argument heard.

This is first application filed by the applicant underSection 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

The present applicant was arrested by Police Station-Avantipur Badodiya District Shajapur in Crime No.194/2015 under Sections 363,366 and 376(2)(N) of theIPC and Sections 3 /4 & 5 /6 of the Prevention ofChildren from Sexual Offence Act, 2012.

According to the prosecution story present applicant tookaway the prosecutrix, who was aged about 17 years,married her and kept her as his wife.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicanthad already engaged with prosecutrix. When prosecutrixcame to know that her parents wanted to perform hermarriage with some other person, she prevailed upon thepresent applicant to took her with him. On her insistenceonly the present applicant took her to various places andkept her with him as his wife for some time.Subsequently, he left her at his parent's house.Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.After taking into consideration all the facts andcircumstances of the case and without commenting on merit of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case forgrant of bail. The application filed under Section 439 ofthe Cr.P.C. is allowed.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail onhis furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-(Rs. FiftyThousand Only) and one solvent surety of the likeamount to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistratefor his appearance on all the dates of hearing as may bedirected in this regard during bail.

He is further directed that on being so released on bail,he would comply with the conditions enumerated underSection 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. meticulously.Certified copy as per rules.

(ALOK VERMA)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead