Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCC/236/2024 of RAMKUMAR GAUTAM Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL

ON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 236 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

RAMKUMAR GAUTAM S/O SHRI RAMESH PRASADGAUTAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION:FORMER FOREST GUARD FOREST DIVISION ITARSHIDISTRICT HOSHANGABAD (MADHYA PRADESH)

(BY SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA- ADVOCATE)

.....APPLICANT

AND

1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVT. OF MADHYAPRADESH FOREST DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA,VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVT. OF MADHYAPRADESH FOREST DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA,VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)

2.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OFFOREST BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)FOREST BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST CIRCLEHOSHANGABAD (MADHYA PRADESH)HOSHANGABAD (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.THE SUB DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICERSOHAGPUR DISTRICT HOSHANGABAD (MADHYAPRADESH)SOHAGPUR DISTRICT HOSHANGABAD (MADHYAPRADESH)

5.THE DIVISIONAL FOREST SAGAR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)SAGAR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

OFFICER NORTH

(BY SHRI VIJAY PANDEY - ADVOCATE)

.....RESPONDENTS

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard on I.A. No.1396/2024, which is an application under Section 5 ofthe Limitation Act for condonation of delay.

2. On perusal of the record, it appears that the instant MCC is filed withinlimitation, therefore, there is no need to pass any order on I.A. No.1396/2024,hence is disposed off/closed.

4. Heard on the question of admission.

5. The present application has been filed for restoration of WP No.17760/2012,which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 25.10.2023.

6. Considering the averments made in the application supported by anaffidavit of the applicant, this Court finds that sufficient cause is shown forrestoration of WP No.17760/2012.

7. Accordingly, MCC is allowed.

8. WP No.17760/2012 is restored to its original number subject to payment ofcost of Rs 2,000/- (Two thousand only) which shall be paid to the M.P. HighCourt Bar Association, Jabalpur within a period of seven days, failing which,the order of dismissal of WP No.17760/2012 shall remain intact.

9. The payment of cost of Rs.2000/- shall be a condition precedent forrestoration of WP No.17760/2012.restoration of WP No.17760/2012.

10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off.

11. A copy of this order be kept in the file of WP No.17760/2012.

pb

(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead