Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/14664/2016 of SACHIN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 29 December 2016
No. 14664/2016 (Sachin vs. State of M.P.) 29/12/2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Relief
1 M.Cr.C No. 14664/2016(Sachin vs. State of M.P.)
29/12/2016
Shri M.M. Tripathi, Advocate for applicant.
Shri R.D. Agrawal, Panel lawyer for respondent/State.Heard.
This is first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant has been arrested in Crime No. 514/2016registered at Police Station Thatipur, District Gwalior (M.P), forthe offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Excise Act.
According to prosecution case, it is alleged that 60 bulkliters country made liquor has been seized from the possessionof the applicant and co-accused without having any license.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant thatco-accused has already been granted bail by coordinate Benchof this Court vide order dated 09.12.2016 passed in M.Cr.C No.14054/2016. Applicant claims parity with the said co-accused.
Prayer is opposed by learned Panel Lawyer.
Perused the case diary.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,without commenting on the merits of the case, the applicationis allowed. It is directed that applicant Sachin shall be releasedon bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum ofRs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solventsurety in the like amount to the satisfaction of TrialCourt/Committal Court.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms andconditions of the bond executed by him;conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extendinginducement, threat or promise to any personacquainted with the facts of the case so as to (and)
2 M.Cr.C No. 14664/2016(Sachin vs. State of M.P.)
dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to theCourt or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similarto the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessaryadjournments during the trial; and
6. The applicant will not leave India without previouspermission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, asthe case may be.
A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.
C.C. as per rules
(Rohit Arya) Judge