Meghalaya High Court
MC(CA)/1/2015 of Satvijay Investment & Consultancy Services Pvt Ltd Vs Shebawheels Pvt Ltd on 24 November 2015
In CA No.2/2015 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH 24.11.2015 Heard Mr. S Murarka, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. A Chakravarty, learned counsel for the respondent. Inspite of the order of this Court dated 09.11.2015 that “in case of failure on the part of
24.11.2015
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH
Heard Mr. S Murarka, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.
A Chakravarty, learned counsel for the respondent.
Inspite of the order of this Court dated 09.11.2015 that “in case of failure on the part of the respondent to file their affidavit-in-opposition within the period indicated above, this misc. application shall be considered and disposed of with the materials available on record”, the respondent has not yet filed their affidavit-in-opposition.
This is an application for condoning the delay of 15 days in filing the accompanying appeal against the order of the Company Law Board Delhi in the case of M/s Shebawheels (P) Ltd. v. Satvijay Investment & Consultancy Services (P) Ltd. & Orsdated 27.05.2015. The reasons for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal are mentioned in paras 2 & 3 of the misc. application. This Court has given anxious consideration to the reasons mentioned in paras 2 & 3 of the present misc. application and is of the considered view that sufficient cause have been shown for condoning the delay in filing the accompanying appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 15 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.
Misc. application is allowed.
JUDGE
Lam
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…