Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./102/2024 of PRADYUMNA KUMAR BORAH @ PRADYUNNYA BORAH Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 7 ORS. on 17 October 2024
List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 102 of 2024 Date of Order: 17.10.2024 ____________________________________________________________ Sri. Pradyumna Kumar Borah Vs. 1.State of Meghalaya rep. by. Home @ Pradyunnya Borah. Deptt., Meghalaya. Son of (L) L. N. Borah, R/o;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No.01 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No. 102 of 2024
Date of Order: 17.10.2024
____________________________________________________________
Sri. Pradyumna Kumar Borah@ Pradyunnya Borah.Son of (L) L. N. Borah,R/o; NonoiDistrict: Nagoan, Assam,Pin- 782101.
Vs. 1.State of Meghalaya rep. by. Home Deptt., Meghalaya.
2. Hitesh Brahma. S/o Jagat Brahma Resident of Khatikuchi Medical Borbhag, Nalbari – 781369.
3. Sri. Jagat BrahmaS/o UnknownResident of Khatikuchi MedicalBorbhag, Nalbari – 781369.
4. Topazzul HussainS/o SoferuddinResident of Bholaguri VillageP.O. & P.S. BongaigaonAssam. PIN: 783380.
5. Bikash Kumar.
6. Sahil Kumar.
7. Vinay Singh.
8. Sahjid Badshah.
….Petitioner.
….( 5 to 8 are Proforma Respondents under Care of Respondents 2, 3 & 4).
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. P. K. Borah, (in person)
For the Respondent(s): Ms. S. Shyam, GA. (R: 1)
Mr. S. A. Majaw, Adv. (R: 4)
Heard Mr. P. K. Borah, the petitioner appearing in person.
This is an application for striking out the names of the respondentsNo. 5, 6, 7 & 8 from the array of parties in Crl. Rev. P. No. 14 of 2023 onthe ground that the presence of the said respondents are not required foradjudication of this mater and the petitioner also has not made any prayeragainst them.
The learned Counsels appearing for the respondents No.1 & 4 haveno objection to the prayer made in this application.
Accordingly, this application stands allowed.
The names of the respondents No.5,6,7 & 8 stands deleted from thearray of parties in Crl. Rev. P. No. 14 of 2023.
The petitioner shall take necessary steps for correction of the cause- title of the revision application.
The application is disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya17.10.2024“Biswarup PS”