Meghalaya High Court
AB/6/2024 of SILBIRTH D. SANGMA Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 1 May 2024
No. 03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 6 of 2024 Date of Order: 01.05.2024 Shri. Silbirth D. Sangma, S/o (L) Panjang Marak, Resident of Boldakgre, P.S & P.O Salmanpara, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. ::::: Petitioner -Vs- State of Meghalaya Represented by
Serial No. 03 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
AB. No. 6 of 2024
Date of Order: 01.05.2024
Shri. Silbirth D. Sangma, S/o (L) Panjang Marak, Resident of Boldakgre, P.S & P.O Salmanpara, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. ::::: Petitioner -Vs- State of Meghalaya ::::: Respondent Represented by the Public Prosecotor
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Deb, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Khan, PP. with Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP. Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl. Sr. GA. Mr. J.N. Rynjah, GA.
i) Whether approved for reporting in Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: Yes/No ORAL:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that the petitioner on the strength of this Court’s order dated 22.04.2024, wherein on being allowed to go on interim bail and on being directed to appear before the Investigating Officer, has accordingly reported before the Investigating Officer and his statement has been duly recorded. The petitioner has therefore cooperated with the investigation and having no criminal antecedents with his reputation sought to be kept intact, he prays before this Court for the said ad-interim bail to be made absolute. 2. Mr. K. Khan, learned PP appearing on behalf of the State respondent has also agreed that the report of the Investigating Officer would show that the petitioner has indeed cooperated with the investigation, and since the investigation into the case is still in progress, though the nature of the offence alleged are serious, it would be prudent to allow the investigation to be completed. However, taking into account the background of the case that is, the facts and circumstances wherein the alleged offence was committed as a result of a scuffle between two rival groups in course of electioneering in the ensuing general election, therefore, the motive as far as pre-meditation or otherwise, may not be present, prima facie. The learned PP has therefore left it to the discretion of this Court to pass necessary orders in this regard.
3. This Court, on consideration of the submission made, and on perusal of the copy of the case diary as well as the status report filed by the Investigating Officer, it is seen that the incident wherein the petitioner is said to be involved has taken place on 16.03.2024 at Kathalbari Gandhipara junction in the South West Garo Hills Distrcit. The allegation is that the petitioner along with others have confronted the occupants of one vehicle being Mahindra Bolero (white colour) when the driver of the said vehicle had gone out of the vehicle and in the process, had also set fire to the vehicle with the intention to kill the occupant who is the complainant who had filed the FIR before the In-Charge, Garodoba O.G.C, South West Garo Hills, Meghalaya. However, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not at all involved in the alleged offence or incident since he was sitting inside another vehicle which was also present at the scene of the incident.
4. It is a matter of evidence as to whether the petitioner was indeed involved in the said incident and since there is no identification of the petitioner as far as his presence at the scene is concerned, it would be up to the Investigating Officer to find sufficient evidence in this regard. However, as far as the prayer of the petitioner is concerned, at this point of time, the Court is inclined to allow the prayer made, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case. The interim bail granted is hereby made absolute.
5. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner Shri. Silbirth D. Sangma is directed to be released on bail on the following conditions that:
i) He shall not abscond or tamper with the evidence and witnesses; witnesses;
ii) He shall not leave the jurisdiction of the State of Meghalaya without due prior permission from the
Investigating Officer or the court concerned;
iii) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; when required; He shall personally bind himself on a bond of ₹ 50,000/- ly bind himself on a bond of ₹ 50,000/- 0,000/- iv) He shall personally bind himself on a bond of ₹ 50,000/- ly bind himself on a bond of ₹ 50,000/- 0,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only with one surety of like (Rupees fifty thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
6. In view of the above, this application is accordingly disposed of.
No costs.
Judge
Meghalaya
01.05.2024 “D. Nary, PS”