Meghalaya High Court
AB/23/2024 of AILYNTI LYNGDOH Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. on 28 November 2024
Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 23 of 2024 Date of Decision: 28.11.2024 Smti. Ailynti Lyngdoh D/o Moris Mukhim R/o Umtung, Bhoirymbong, Ri- Bhoi District, Meghalaya. ::::: Petitioner - Vs- 1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by Commissioner and Secretariat Department of
Serial No. 01Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
AB. No. 23 of 2024
Date of Decision: 28.11.2024
Smti. Ailynti Lyngdoh
D/o Moris MukhimR/o Umtung, Bhoirymbong, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya.
:::::Petitioner
- Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by CommissionerRepresented by Commissioner and Secretariat Department ofHome, Civil Secretariat building,Shillong.
2. The Superintendent of Police,
East Jaintia Hills DistrictMeghalaya.Meghalaya.
3. The Officer-in-Charge, East
Jaintia Hills District,Meghalaya.Meghalaya.
:::::Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s): Mr. N.I. Choudhury, Adv.For the Respondent(s): Mr. K. Khan, PP. withMr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.
Mr. R. Gurung, GA.
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. N.I. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner hascandidly submitted that the Investigating Officer had informed thepetitioner that she is no longer required in the matter as far as arrest isconcerned, since the charge sheet has already been filed. As such, at thispoint of time, there is no question of apprehension of arrest. Accordingly,he prays that this petition may be withdrawn as infructuous.
2. Mr. K. Khan, learned PP assisted by Mr. S. Sengupta, learnedAddl. PP appearing on behalf of the State respondent has no objection tothe prayer made.
3. Accordingly, this petition is hereby dismissed as infructuous and the same is disposed of.
Judge