Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./123/2024 of AZIAL HOQUE Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 21 November 2024
Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 123 of 2024 in AB. No. 22 of 2024 Date of Order: 21.11.2024 Shri. Azial Hoque, S/o Joynal Abdin, R/o Vill. Gomaijhora, P.O. Gomaijhora, P.S. Phulbari, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. ::::: Applicant -Vs- 1. State of Meghalaya,
Serial No. 04 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 123 of 2024 inAB. No. 22 of 2024
Date of Order: 21.11.2024
Shri. Azial Hoque,S/o Joynal Abdin,R/o Vill. Gomaijhora, P.O. Gomaijhora,P.S. Phulbari, West Garo Hills District,Meghalaya.
:::::Applicant -Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Meghalaya,Represented by the Secretary, HomeDepartment, Government of Meghalaya.2.Smti. Anjuma Begum,W/o Sahmed Ali,R/o Village Jayantipur, P.O. Burha,P.S. Sipajhar, District Darrang, Assam.
:::::Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)For the Respondent(s):
:
Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, Adv. viceMr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv.
Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG. withMr. E.R. Chyne, GA.
ORAL:
Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, learned counsel for the applicant hassubmitted that pursuant to this Court’s order dated 06.11.2024, anapplication for impleadment of the complainant, Smti. Anjuma Begumas respondent No. 2 has been filed before this Court. It is thereforeprayed that the said application being registered as Crl.M.C. No. 123of 2024 be allowed and the complainant be impleaded as respondentNo. 2 in the main case.
The application is not opposed by the learned AAG, Mr.N.D. Chullai assisted by Mr. E.R. Chyne, learned GA as far as theState respondent is concerned. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed.Misc. Case disposed of.
Registry to make necessary corrections in the cause title.
Judge