Allahabad High Court

CRLP/11288/2025 of PANNE LAL YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 29 May 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. - 2025:AHC:93908-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11288 of 2025 Petitioner :- Panne Lal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil

Court No. - 42

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11288 of 2025

Petitioner :- Panne Lal YadavRespondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Harish Kumar TripathiCounsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.'Honble Anil Kumar-X,J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA forthe State respondent.

2. Petitioner is before this Court with a request commanding therespondent no.2-District Magistrate, Gorakhpur to decide theapplication dated 10.2.2025 moved by the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal ofhis grievance, the petitioner has already made a detailedrepresentation to the Respondent No.2, namely, DistrictMagistrate, Gorakhpur on 10.2.2025, which is pendingconsideration.

4. Learned AGA very fairly that in case any such representation isstill pending and has not been disposed of, the same will beconsidered and decided expeditiously.

5. In view of the above, on consent and without expressing anyopinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts andcircumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finallyasking the petitioner to move a fresh representation before thesecond respondent i.e., District Magistrate, Gorakhpur ventilatinghis grievance within three months from today and in case any suchrepresentation is being preferred definitely the same would belooked into, examined and remedied strictly in accordance withlaw expeditiously.

(Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)

Order Date :- 30.5.2025/Mukesh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead